Today, natural history museums and popular science books paint a picture of the evolution of the universe that began with a big bang about 14 billion years ago. Atoms were formed from elementary particles such as quarks and electrons, which initially formed amorphous clouds of gas, from which large-scale structures such as galaxies with their stars, planets, moons, and other celestial bodies emerged. On Earth - and probably on other life-supporting planets as well - the first primitive life forms were formed over billions of years from complex organic molecules, from which multicellular organisms evolved, including humans.
In the course of this natural history, the great leaps in development are remarkable:
- The origin of life on earth
- The genesis of the genetic code
- The emergence of consciousness
- The development of human intelligence
- The formation of free will
Obviously, in the course of natural history, there has been a trend toward higher development, toward the creation of ever more complex manifestations from simpler basic structures. The driving force behind this is still a great mystery. The human quest for knowledge is based on the assumption that there are fundamental principles according to which the world is structured and develops over time. This assumption cannot be proven by strict logic, but the success story of modern science suggests that the assumption is justified. Because these basic building blocks and rules are quite simple, we as humans have any chance at all, with our limited cognitive abilities, of finding out what holds the world together at its core.
Although it is a fundamental question that is essential to our understanding of the world, contemporary science does not systematically address this mystery. Natural history is not an established discipline in the scientific community. To address questions such as the origin of life or the emergence of consciousness, one must draw on the findings of various disciplines and figure out for oneself how the known pieces of the puzzle might fit together.
However, contemporary science is differentiated into many disciplines and specialized subjects, each with its own approach. Overarching connections and fundamental principles cannot be identified in this way. As Goethe so aptly put it in his Faust:
Who wants to recognize and describe the living,
First seeks to exorcize the spirit which is life giving;
Then he has the parts in his hand,
Missing, alas! only the spirit's band.
The fundamental principles of the structure of the world and its natural-historical development can only be recognized if an overarching approach is chosen. The systems theory approach appears to be the most suitable for this purpose. The editorial team of welträtsel.org aims to demonstrate the potential of this approach through the articles on the site.
Comments powered by CComment